I'm not going to comment on Kelowna per se. In any area of public policy, whether it's reform to employment insurance, or agriculture, or trade policy, consultation with the people affected is an important role. We have a job to do there, and so do parliamentarians.
In the world of aboriginal policy, there is a bedrock of recognized aboriginal and treaty rights, and legal obligations from the Supreme Court for consultations that make it doubly important to work and consult with the aboriginal peoples affected by our decisions. So if Kelowna is a proxy for engaging and consulting aboriginal peoples affected by our laws and policies, absolutely it would help.