Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
I would just point out that Mr. Sweet's motion is actually in violation of his own motion. We didn't receive this 48 hours in advance. We're receiving it today.
I don't know how serious Mr. Sweet is about this, but I would agree with Mr. Christopherson that it doesn't make a good deal of sense. If the committee were already seized with a matter, it could debate it. Mr. Hubbard proved earlier that if the committee is not ready to deal with a matter it can simply table it. This would unduly slow things down, and the committee already has within its power to set aside something it is not ready to deal with.