If I may speak briefly to it, as chair, I see situations where an examiner gets into it and they're just getting to the nub of the issue and the eight minutes are up. I feel bad in cutting it off, although I have no choice under the routine motions. Of course, normally, the next examiner will go to a totally different subject or topic. Sometimes you wonder if we'd be better off if we had fewer questioners rather than more, but these are the Standing Orders.
I know your point, Mr. Hubbard, but again, I appreciate Mr. Williams' point too.
Any other discussion?
Mr. Fitzpatrick.