I concur with what I've heard from Mr. Laforest, Mr. Poilievre, and Mr. Christopherson. We haven't finished. There is a general feeling that the situation was never properly explained. We had an extraordinary step taken to overrule an original decision that seemed to be common sense. We've never really heard about these extraordinary circumstances that were required to justify overruling this decision.
I think we need to hear from these people. This is a great starting point and is exactly what this committee is supposed to be looking into.