--and I'll try to capture them rapidly.
I have read the Auditor General's report many times. Indeed, I said that I agree with all of the recommendations and will repeat it as often as you want.
The question of the percentage of lookouts that would be missed by officers is a question of training. There is no doubt in my mind, zero doubt, that we don't miss one-fifth of the lookouts. The report and the procedure referred to a sub-area, and we can discuss that, but that would not be a proper projection in the whole universe of lookouts.
You made a point about the question of exchange of passports. This is a serious concern, and we have procedures in place to ensure that people come with the right passport. We have rovers and employees who are in the area where the exchange could be made. We also have something that's unique and that other countries, including the United States, would like to do: we have migration integrity officers in airports all over the world, in 39 countries. They basically work against that phenomenon. We have had success; we intercept more than 5,000 people every year who are trying to come in using these mechanisms. So we are doing that, and we are training our people so they can be better at doing that.
Your last point was on separate lines. I get that comment often, and when I travel and come back I make that comment myself. We discussed it, and we've tried it many times. Most of the time we've had to get out of it because the ratio of Canadians and non-Canadians in big airports is changing very rapidly; therefore, it is turning out to be less efficient to do it that way. But we will explore it again. We are actually doing it at Vancouver International Airport with the help of the airport authority, who are putting some resources into doing traffic management, because you need to adjust the flow of traffic very rapidly when you do that.