It's encouraging to hear that there's follow-up, but these numbers are incredibly discouraging, and the previous answers are somewhat discouraging as well because they didn't seem to indicate an acceptance of responsibility, especially in the case of this NORAD contract and what should have been one of our most secure facilities.
I understand that the facility required additional contracting and modifications so that it could be used for its intended purposes. What is the cost now of those modifications since proper security did not occur? It also says that there were foreign contractors involved in this. Who were some of the foreign contractors? Do we know?