Mr. Chairman, the checking out of the “no requirement”, which is what Madam Fraser and I are making reference to, was not a requirement clearly stated in the government security policy. At the time of the audit, we were of the opinion that what we had done--and probably my colleagues around the table would say that as well--was consistent with the intent of the government security policy, and I think the board would probably confirm that. We thought we were consistent.
In the dialogue with the auditors and Madam Fraser, we also concluded that there's nothing like greater certainty. For the purposes of greater certainty, say you don't have a requirement and then you thought about it, so at that time--