I'm also a little bit concerned about Mr. Guimont's comment. I think when we were talking about 24 sensitive contracts, in regard to the 86, I think the quote was that quite a number were done correctly. It seems to me that this would be okay in some circumstances, but when we're dealing with sensitive contracts and the security of our country, I'm not sure that the threshold should be that we have quite a number done correctly. I would rather hear that we're shooting for perfection, not that we're doing okay.
On February 26th, 2008. See this statement in context.