It's my understanding that shortly afterwards it came mainly from the employees of CED that they were upset about moving. They had been there and they were comfortable, like anybody in their house. They were comfortable where they were.
Somehow Mr. Drouin writes a letter asking if you could possibly reassess the situation and consider a stay at Place Victoria. With that, in due diligence your group looked at that prospect in terms of what might be renewed and the costs that were just placed on your table about comparable accommodations at another place in the same city. Somebody does the costing and says that maybe it's in our best interests, because we can rent this other space to somebody else in the public service or with some other client, and you think that in the long term it's probably in the best interest of the government and in the public interest.
Is that the correct assumption of what happened?