Thank you, Chair.
I don't think there's anybody on this committee who is not supportive of the intent that Mr. Wrzesnewskyj has, and I'm not opposed to the arguments that Mr. Williams makes; I'm just not comfortable voting up or down. Regardless of how you look at it, it's going to boil down to if you think this is important enough to warrant asking the AG to do this. That's a way it could be framed.
I have a suggestion, through you, Chair, of a friendly amendment, or wording...
Borys, this is directly to you. It's okay, I don't expect you to hang off every word I say. But I wondered if you would consider that we send correspondence--maybe with this motion--to the AG asking her opinion on whether or not, in light of work that's being done in other committees, this is timely and whether it's the right focus, and then get her feedback. Then we can make a determination, rather than trying to guess whether the other two committees are catching.... The last thing any of us want is to duplicate things. The last thing any of us want is to leave a gap of work to be done in this area. So maybe we could ask her what would be the best way to go in terms of content of a motion, or direction to her request, and timeliness of it, and that way we can be a little more precise.
Those are just my thoughts. Thanks.