Okay, but the direction is do it if you can, not look at everything and then we'll see if this happens to be one. There's a pretty clear direction there. The “if possible” sounds more polite than anything, but fair enough, if there's a block, just say no, but other than that, they're saying directly, go with the lease and this would follow....
This is what drives us crazy. On March 28, 2002, a letter was sent to the people at Place Bonaventure telling them we've got a deal. On April 15 we have a letter from a minister saying we don't have a deal. What we're trying to do is find out why. What happened in this discussion, this heads-up thing? You can appreciate how frustrated we are. Who made this decision and why? We're still not hearing that.
Why was the deal that was signed when Place Victoria came in fourth...? The whole process was done, and weeks later there's just this edict that comes down. The heads-up phone calls are all nice and fine, but the official paperwork says an edict came down weeks later, after the darn thing.... The ink was hardly dry and a minister shoots off a letter on April 15 saying go back to Place Victoria. Why?