So when the Auditor General's report came out, to the public it sounded like a lot of money to have paid $4 million to lease a property that you weren't utilizing, and for the Government of Canada, of course, it didn't look good. When you reflect on that, you mentioned in your beginning statements that there is justification in that we did get a good deal. Rather than losing money in the short run, maybe in the long run the crown was just as well off by what the deputy minister had recommended.
On March 6th, 2008. See this statement in context.