Two years. So there is a lot of history that precedes you, obviously.
Maybe I'll stick with this line of questioning. In talking about the contracts, paragraph 3.35, you're hopefully now going to submit a list of those contracts that have gone directly to Inuvialuit. But what are we going to do in the future to assure this doesn't happen? I'm particularly concerned with broad-brush principles that at the time of the agreement weren't fleshed out, so that now, 23 years later, we're actually asking for a legal opinion about what “reasonable share” is. I hope you can see how people would have a jaded opinion about the whole process. Are there specific things we're doing right now to make sure this doesn't happen again?