While our main focus in our report was on processing of returns, we did not ourselves reprocess returns; we didn't take a sample and run through them to reprocess to see what should have been. We did look at the efficiency aspect with respect to the processing, and we mention in the report that we found that the processing, given the complexity of the program, was error-prone, especially in the upfront portion of the processing.
There's a second unit that checks the processing of the first unit, and we found that about 30% were sent back for reprocessing. So from a complexity and an error-processing perspective, we did find a fair amount of error. But we did not reprocess applications. If there's somebody who didn't receive a payment who maybe should have, we didn't reprocess it.
But we made reference and the deputy minister also made reference to the fact that they've changed that now. We suggested that in their sampling process they do some sampling of those non-payments to see whether there are errors in them as well as in the other ones. The deputy minister has now said that they are doing it.