In both reports we seem to have a great amount of frustration with the administration, and there was concern in the Auditor General's report that some Agriculture workers, people within the department, had assisted farmers in completing their reports. Was this done as a method to assist farmers or as a method to gain income for the people who were helping farmers? What I've heard is that the damned thing was so costly to farmers, with the accountability required, that many farmers simply couldn't pay the accountant. He became one of their bigger expenses in terms of dealing with CAIS.
When you are critical of those people in the field who helped, are you saying they did that for financial gain or to assist farmers?