That's a little surprising, that you wouldn't have seen the actual exhibit that has triggered a series of meetings and you're appearing before the committee today.
Let me tell you what the Auditor General's exhibit 7.2 states. It says that
The Agency's request not to move, combined with the lack of adherence to established guidelines, has cost taxpayers an additional $4.6 million.
Unfortunately, it's almost like a throw-in exhibit. It didn't provide any of the documentation to explain how the Auditor General arrived at that number of $4.6 million. We've since found those numbers unfortunately misleading because they're based on a fictitious gross rental rate of $430, which was the number initially in the tender, but the actual number was $308.
In your two or three inches of documents, do you have the table of the original tender?