Okay, so there was between $500,000 and perhaps as much as $1 million in lost productivity, and $1 million in moving costs. I also understand from testimony by Mr. Gladu that “Improvements that should have been made were not made”, and he certainly got into the nitty-gritty. He said:
For example, the carpeting was very dirty but was not able to be changed. However, people at the Agency did what they had to do and were able to perform their work effectively
I guess they were willing to put up with dirty carpets and not having to move after 10 to 20 years in the same location--25 or 30 years for some of the people. Were there a lot of complaints from that staff of 300 about having to move, after having worked in that location for such a long time?