I agree with you: there's no doubt. Thanks, Mr. Boudria.
So if they do the job, they would assume and I would assume that when the staff tell us and the Auditor General that they've reviewed the current situation in which the lease is expiring, when they come back and say there's not a deal that can be done here based on future needs for the department, based on costs, and that they can't stay here and they're recommending they go somewhere else.... Would you assume also that they've considered how much it costs to move, what the inefficiencies are, and how much it might upset people? Do you not think that would have been part of the initial review as to whether or not just staying where they were would have been the right thing to do, right from the get-go to save us all this money and time and effort? Would you not say that's a fair assumption--this is not a big one--that they would look at those things?