Based on what you're saying, it must have been the deputy minister's--Mrs. Cochrane--and Mr. Goodale's preoccupation, because they were the officers, or they were the responsible people politically and officially for the Minister of Public Works. So once Drouin put in his request it went back to Public Works, and Mr. Goodale was the minister and Mrs. Cochrane was the deputy minister. So based on what I read of their testimony, they must have talked. The same civil servants who at one time didn't want to draft the memorandum for the signature of the minister drafted the memorandum for the signature of the minister to keep Mr. Drouin or Canada Economic Development in Place Victoria.
So these are the same people.