But Mr. Poilievre never actually even referred to Mr. Gladu's name when he read the testimony into the record, yet you knew it was Mr. Gladu who had said it.
In previous testimony you said that you asked Public Works for a “verification” based on your deputy minister stating that the move would cost $1 million and that Place Bonaventure was a concrete building with a train running below it. Your letter to Minister Boudria does not mention any of those reasons, only that you wished to remain in a “prestige” address.
Why the discrepancy?