I agree, and I think the committee would as well.
I want to move on to the issue of alternative dispute resolution. I commend the Department of Justice for incorporating alternative dispute resolution as a method of reducing costly litigation.
Unfortunately, the Auditor General's report found that these initiatives lack clear objectives and estimates around potential savings, and also that there was no project management structure or even a formal review of the outcomes.
In light of those findings, can you tell us how we can ensure that these alternative dispute resolution initiatives are effective in achieving favourable results for the government? How are we measuring this, and what plans do you have to begin measuring it on a go-forward basis?