My concern is that a lot of the resources at your disposal, which are already limited, might be directed towards analyzing and estimating costs for private members' business, which I believe should be done initially by the government. Anyhow....
The last point is that I presume you'll insist that parliamentarians have the ability to compare apples to apples. So might I ask, sir, when you prepare your analysis of government budgeting, that you also look at the underlying definitions. When you have a change in government, obviously there may be a different orientation and different priorities, and therefore governments and their ministers might be tempted to redefine certain statistics so as to project conclusions that would better serve their intentions. I'm not saying that's necessarily a bad thing. That's why we have a democracy. But I would hope that when you provide analysis to parliamentarians you flag any change in definition that has led to a change in picture that has led to a change in the government resources being proposed. Will you undertake to do that, sir?