I'm curious, then. Being from the Treasury Board Secretariat, with all the things you're left to coordinate, I'm just surprised that you would take that approach—“let's try this”—a minimalist sort of approach. I understand not wanting to inundate the books with policies—Lord knows, we have policy enough—but given that the alarm has already been raised and we're already into fix-it mode, into repair, into damage control, all those kinds of things, why go halfway; why leave the risk that we're going to have to re-visit this? It seems to me that in a repair job you go a bit further, trying to head off the next repair job too.
