Thank you very much, Chair.
My first question builds on the point Mr. Lake was making. You talked about tools just now. My question is around the guide to costing, and I believe that in the AG report on page 27, 1.91, in response to the report, you noted, sir, that you released one in March 2008 and you're going to do an update in March 2009.
Given that the problem is lack of uniformity of applying the rules and the law the way they should be—you have all these different entities doing it differently—in making sure you have the tools, and giving the entity the tools, why would you limit it and leave it as a guide? Why would Treasury Board Secretariat not impose a policy, a directive, something that says they should do it this way? But instead you leave it as a guide, which then leaves the regime and the schemes to be different once again from place to place. Why not make it very clear as to what they do, that you don't want to see it done any other way. Then everybody is on the same page over a short period of time.