I think the office does not have a position on what the calculation should be. We looked at whether the calculation was done in relation to what was approved in terms of the fee approval. So if it's approved in a way that would include that, then that would clearly be something that would be acceptable when we would review it.
I think the issue from our perspective would be how much that contingency would be. You cannot predict something unique that would cost an amount that would reflect in that fee calculation what actuals may be. You're not going to have a Lebanon situation every year, as history would prove, and I'm not sure how you would predict what it would be or whether it would be a tsunami instead of a Lebanon, but certainly, as I've said, once it's approved, that would be what we would audit against.