But if there was this one-time charge, the whole intent of tabling the fee would be that the department or agency would be required to explain what costs were being recovered, how this benchmarked against other international norms, etc. And if it had been tabled in Parliament, maybe someone might have asked why you were including this one-time non-recurring—hopefully, or at least certainly it was one-time at that time—fee into this cost recovery.
So you're saying that.... It's this grey area where the departments and agencies interpret it to suit their own needs, where you're saying the fee has been around, but the fee that is being charged is different, right? And it went up?