I'm not sure that there's an inconsistency between the Auditor General's view and ours. I think, generally speaking, that the Auditor General said that we're not properly applying the right deductions to the gross charges to bring down to a net charge the amounts that are properly comparable to the fees. We agreed with that.
The only difference, and the reason you see two lines of presentation in the report, is that we suggested to the Auditor General that some of the costs borne by our consular officers abroad for passport services are properly consular fees and consular services, so we built those back into our calculations. You see a slight discrepancy in calculation. But fundamentally, there is no disagreement in the conclusion.