I agree with that. We did indeed talk about it.
As I said earlier, when we made our original erroneous calculations showing us in a deficit position over three years, we did not move to increase the fee because we wanted to see whether or not there was a reasonable trend. I think a conversation that led to a little more clarity for departments in terms of what that time period should be, and what sort of normal versus extraordinary costs should be included in the calculation, would probably be quite helpful.