Mr. Chairman, first of all, on the issue of the review that is being done by the chief of review services--an error perhaps of omission that we did not inform the clerk, certainly not an error of commission--the timing of that review was always intended. I don't remember exactly the date the blueprints were found. I asked for the review to be done shortly after that, long before the timing of this hearing would have been set up. So I apologize for not having thought through the idea of informing the clerk that perhaps we wanted to wait.
We'll certainly make the results of that review to the extent there's nothing classified. I expect there will be nothing classified in that review. The report will be available to the committee as soon as it is available.
On the member's other question, Mr. Chairman, on the nature of the blueprints, I would turn it over either to Colonel Mike Day, who will be the owner of this building shortly, or put it back to the DSO. I am not unsympathetic to the questions the member is raising. All I am telling you is that we followed a process—process is not unimportant—established under the government security policy. Through our own departmental security policy we did a security requirements checklist on this project, and we came to the conclusion that the blueprints did not need to be classified.
I would just say, by way of closing, and then turn it over, that as it turns out, the electricals on those blueprints, as I understand them, were about 50% aligned or correlated with the final electricals within the building.
I'll turn to my colleagues for any comments they may want to make on the actual intention.