Well, the issue comes back to the fact that under the practices of the department at that time the shells of the buildings, in most cases, would not be considered classified. It was only when they started to do the fit-up of what goes inside that they then would look at classification.
One of the issues coming out of all this is that maybe they should be considering what is going to happen inside that building much sooner in the process--I think the department agrees with that--and what the context is around that building. In this case, I believe it was a training centre. A training centre in and of itself may not be particularly sensitive, but if you have sensitive conversations going on there, which one might think could happen in this particular location, maybe you would want to think about the security earlier.
This is one of the issues that I think are coming out of this whole thing. The way of treating the building as a shell, as being unclassified, meaning that all the plans for that are unclassified and open to the public, to people who are contracting on it, may not be the best way of going about this and that there should be a more rigorous security consideration given to what is going to happen in those buildings earlier in the process.