Yes, we've been working especially with our Australian confreres for many years and with our New Zealand confreres as well. What we learned from the Australians early on, and it applies more generally to almost any regulatory framework, is that if you choose to take the voluntary approach, which the Australians did, in the hopes that you're going to get full compliance, then what you probably get, and that was their experience, is a situation in which the 80% of the industry that thought this was a good idea and could benefit from it put it in place. Unfortunately, in my opinion, the regulator is responsible for 100% of the industry. So if you don't have the tools in place to deal with the 20% who aren't wanting to buy into the new contract and the new approach, you'd better be able to deal with them.
I've just met with the manager in charge in Australia, and they are promoting as rapidly as they possibly can the regulatory framework to put the SMS in place there. Right now it's voluntary. Where it's working, it's working extremely well. And then there are some issues, I guess, with those who are outside, who aren't wanting to buy into the process.
So yes, we learned that early on, and that's why we took the approach we did.