Thank you.
The military has been lauded for its inventory systems, which have served as a template for other countries. Mind you, when you look at the situation in Iraq with the Americans and how they track—or don't track—their billions and billions of dollars worth of equipment contracts, that's not the best model to measure yourself against. Why wouldn't we go one step further? Most large corporate entities that carry critical inventories would actually, as opposed to the mission or the rotation, use 13 four-week inventory periods. Every four weeks there's an inventory done. Is there an intention to step it up one level, so we don't wait until end of mission to find out the status?
The second part to this question is, is there an upgrade? When we take inventories, there's the equipment in Afghanistan and also the spare parts and equipment back in Canada. It's a continuous pipeline. Is it a coordinated inventory system? When we make inventories in Afghanistan, do we do it at the same time in Canada? If we move to an even more precise system, for instance a 13 four-week system, would that be coordinated throughout the pipeline?