Obviously, it's relevant to the line of questions that the committee wants to look into, but as you know, sometimes committees are concerned about privacy rights. The employer-employee relationship is by nature private in some respects, but in other respects is quite public, particularly where, as here, it's within a public institution.
The status of this individual in that institution as an employee has been very much in question, particularly in the reinstatement to full employment. It's understandable that the committee might be interested in knowing whether there were any conditions attached to that reinstatement, but I think points about privacy might be kept in mind.