I'm actually quite comfortable with the existing motion. I don't have too much of a problem with it, except that what we have right now takes up more time in the first session.
And it does put an imbalance within the parties on the first round of questioning, because both the Liberals and Conservatives have two rounds in the first round, if you know what I mean. If you have a premier round that way it does put a bit of an imbalance, even though they have the superiority in numbers. I'm suggesting we need a balance through the entire process, not just in one area versus the other.
If you take those two and leave the four with equal time, that does allow some extra latitude of time to put into your other section of five minutes. Then, when we run through those on the prescribed list, where we've been alternating as per the proposal from Mr. Christopherson, it actually shows that we're committed to parity and “fairity”--if you love that word.