I'm hearing that the issues are a balancing of the political interests, making sure there's balance there; number two, making sure there's some reliable reporting going on; and number three, respect for the witnesses.
I've both a comment and a question. The comment is that it seems to me that 40% of the committee, as in four, makes a reasonable number. It's quite arbitrary, but it still seems a little more credible than three.
The question I have is that when this committee travels to gain evidence, it will make us more effective and streamlined if a smaller number can receive evidence. Is that not correct?