But who advises legislators as to how to govern? We can all go in a circular motion and say that to make it, you take risks; if I'm an accountant, I'll say that the risk for a small entity is $100, for a bigger entity it's $1,000, and for another one it is $1 million. Who tells the legislature that these are the types of checks and balances, without overburdening the agencies? As well, who determines the return on investment? If there's a small agency that's dealing with health, it's wasting its time trying to fill out reports. We saw it with INAC; those small agencies are filling out report after report and are not really attending to the care that they're supposed to give.
Cynicism would say that you're creating jobs for yourself. How do you balance that with real service, which is supposed to be provided?