Thank you, Chair.
As for the reasons as to why the lower-risk files are being disproportionately audited, I'm not sure that we received a very comprehensive explanation to that. It might be something the committee would wish to discuss with the agency. We were given a couple of reasons. One is that some of the staff may not have confidence in the computerized risk assessment system. One of the recommendations we have had, which is a repeat recommendation, is that they should be reviewing the criteria and updating the criteria. This is why it's important that they do, as well, those kinds of baseline audits across the system to see if there are any particular conditions that they're not including in the risk assessment system, and to analyze that.
The other explanation we're getting is that some of the agents may be less experienced and not able to deal with the more complex files. If that is the case, then obviously the agency has to do something to address it, because our main concern in this whole audit is the targeting of the files for audit and that they should be targeting the higher-risk files for their procedures.
As to the amount of money that might be not recovered, we have no estimate of that. I don't believe the agency has. Obviously, there have been many studies about the potential dollar value of the underground economy, but the amounts could be significant.