Now, you brought in a very interesting word, “oversight”, and I was looking at your paragraph 1.12. Some agencies involved in security intelligence, such as the Canadian Forces and Canada Border Services Agency, were not subject to independent review. Therefore, I ask this question. What is interesting is the judgments they make. For example, they made a judgment not to allow MP Galloway, but how did the Vice-President of Iran slip into the country? How did the minister of Gujarat, who is responsible for massacring 2,000 or more people, slip into the country? Where is this balancing act, and what lessons have they learned from the Maher Arar inquiry?
I'm asking you such a large question, but expecting your very short answer, I guess.