I'm going to reiterate what Ms. Ratansi has just said. My feeling is that new information, up-to-date information, is irrelevant because there's an historical context that exists. It was an audit, and an audit is a snapshot in time. So whatever action has or has not been taken by the department, we'll have to wait for the next audit, which will likely come in the next two or two and a half years. This report will serve as the basis for comparison to show what the circumstances were at the time, two and a half years ago, when the first audit was taken. It will be the baseline, and any new information will be captured in a follow-up audit.
You can bet that she'll do a follow-up audit on these departments because of the number of problems she encountered. And as you rightly mentioned, it's been two and a half years, and audits are now occurring every five years, so it will be two to two and a half years before another one is done.