Thanks, Chair.
That sounds fairly straightforward, and I see no reason why we shouldn't be supportive of Madam Faille's trying to get this document; however, I think Mr. Kramp makes an excellent point. As learned as your opinion is, it's just one member's opinion. If there's a way to do some kind of check--in other words, find out exactly what they are saying specifically--and then make a determination on whether or not....
Mr. Kramp makes a good point. We wouldn't want to just say we don't see any conflict, then go ahead and roar it through, and then find out afterwards that upon advice that we ignored, there was an issue.
So it would be a quick—and I emphasize quick—test on that. I'm comfortable giving the chair that mandate, that we ask him to satisfy himself by checking with someone to find out if that reason should come back to us or not, and if not, then plow ahead, and if it should, then bring it back.