I agree with the idea of a paragraph. As for the recommendations, they are mostly about evaluations and follow-up. I am assuming that the departments should eventually provide them. Perhaps they already have started to take steps along those lines. I do not know how all these departments work; I am just a new kid.
I looked at the transcript of the previous meetings. Meili Faille was there at the time, and so was Mr. Christopherson. I noticed that the questions on the recommendations dealt with several of these aspects. It seems to me that we are making life complicated for ourselves. The important thing is that any follow-up must address the situation at the time and not how things are now. The recommendation, which the analysts wrote, I imagine, applied to that point in time. It was a kind of snapshot of the situation. Whatever the case, I completely agree with the idea of the paragraph.