The letter would be a response to the letter to the deputy minister, asking him or her to provide the committee with any facts that have taken place since the auditor's report was issued, whether it's legislation, adoption of policy--in this case, Public Works, the hiring of people. It would be fact-based developments that could be considered by the committee. We don't want glossy statements of intention or principle, or we're going to do this, or we're going to do that. It would have to be fact-based.
On May 7th, 2009. See this statement in context.