Thank you.
My thoughts are very similar to Mr. Kramp's. We need to get information when we need it. If there are reasons, however, protections, then we can't run roughshod over those. I think we've followed a good process here.
My question would be to Mr. Tardi, just framed another way. What vulnerability or level of risk, in your opinion, is the committee vulnerable to if we go ahead with this motion?