Thank you for that. I think I will tackle the first question.
Look, what I would say is that the issues with respect to security and intelligence are by their very nature complex. It does perhaps sound like a simple thing to say, but it is just a reality. My experience is that we are able to prioritize issues and we are able to provide timely advice to the government on priority issues.
I have been a national security advisor for six months but have been associated with this community for many more years, and I have seen a high degree of progress in the celerity, the speed, with which we're able to treat issues. We have better mechanisms now to face events when they occur, whether it is the standing up of the operations centre or, as somebody else mentioned today, the ITAC, the Integrated Threat Assessment Centre. So I do feel that we are well equipped, in fact, to meet the challenges as they come our way.
That being said, can we make more progress? Yes, we can make more progress. But I do not believe that the structure as we have it today is actually an impediment to our providing the right policy advice in a timely fashion. My position is a position of coordination. I sometimes have to accelerate work, to make sure that agencies and departments speed up the work, but I have to say that I am satisfied that they are stepping up to the plate.
So again, in conclusion, not to belabour the point, it is not perfect, but I think it is a lot better than it has been.
Thank you.