They are.
Should they not deal with this in a manner that's deemed acceptable by this committee.... But I think it would be a little bit redundant for us to just go down the same path again. I have no difficulty if the member wishes to bring this back at a later time or even subject to the time or the direction and, I suppose, the purpose and focus of the committee. He would obviously have access to minutes of that.
If something sort of walks like a duck, you sort of wonder if it is a duck. I share his concerns, but I just don't want to go down the same path that someone else is already going down. I think it's a valid point, but could we possibly consider it when he takes a look into the transport committee motion and their testimony and where that has taken us?