With regard to inviting the Deputy Minister of Public Works and Government Services to come before us, I want to point out a couple of things.
First of all, this is an ongoing process. It hasn't been shut. Normally this committee responds after the fact, after the process has already been completed. We take what is like a forensic look at things. This is still ongoing; it hasn't come to completion yet. For us to become involved in something that is still ongoing—this Royal LePage matter—I think is unprecedented, and it's something that I don't recommend.
Secondly, with respect to Public Works, also Royal LePage, a letter was sent to us on June 3. It's a three-page letter, fairly extensive, that goes into great detail about the explanation. Having somebody come here.... He is only going to be verbatim, probably, discussing this letter. I think the letter is a pretty comprehensive letter. What more are we looking for, beyond what's in this letter? Is this letter unsatisfactory to the committee, then?
This is a letter to our chair.