If I may just comment, I'm not going to get into the detail, but it is confusing. The motion talks about expenditures. Mr. Monette says there are no expenditures. He goes on and explains that, but I'm a little confused as to.... If no money's been spent, then his answer is quite simple: there's no money spent.
What bothers me worse than that, though, is the issue that the motion talks about a weekly report. Mr. Monette gave us one report, but he never came back with any other report, so he could very well be in violation of a motion of an order of Parliament, which I find a little disconcerting. I find confusion, and I'm concerned as to why he's not given us the report.
And he may be quite right; there may be no expenditures from vote 35, but again, it's not totally clear in his correspondence.
Mr. Saxton and then Mr. Shipley.