I have just one more question, and we will have to move on, Mr. Lynch. This gets into the Public Appointments Commission.
This is very elaborate. It was done after much public consultation. It talks about a commission. It talks about the code of practice, policies, an audit, and public reporting. It's all good legislation, but there's one little problem in that the whole legislation is not being followed. No one could argue that this is being followed even remotely. You can make your statements that processes have been implemented. You can make your argument that the process has improved. I don't know for sure, but I can tell you one thing: this legislation has not been followed.
So what obligation is there upon your office, the Clerk of the Privy Council, to follow the law? Because we all come to this institution accepting the rule of law. I am under a legal mandate to file my income tax by a certain date. CRA is usually pretty strict on that. I can see it will take time to get this up and running, but it's been almost three years now. Do you see a violation of the rule of law in what's going on here?