I thank you for that answer. It may be a change in the rigour, but everything in theory versus something in practice.
In 2006 the passage of the Federal Accountability Act stated that they would establish a Public Appointments Commission. You talk about the establishment of a PAC that will specify roles. Those codes go with the PAC, but up to 2009, there has been no active commission, apart from the $3 million that has been wasted in keeping the office lights on.
Could you tell me exactly what this PAC is doing, because it does not exist. The House of Commons rejected the appointment and the government has not appointed anyone else. Those codes that you're talking about, the rigorous codes, are all in theory. Nothing has been put in practice, according to what the Auditor General has told us. Could you explain the difference to me, please?