Again, if I may, the process is that the department gives the committee everything in its entirety, uncensored, and then we would make that determination. If we believe there's no public interest to be served and that the individual privacy rights are paramount, then we would order those names removed before anything is made public. That's the key difference, Mr. Kramp, whether the department is doing that or whether we're being denied our rights and we would do it. What I'm saying is, give us the whole thing the way we asked for it, the way we're entitled under the Constitution, and then we will take responsibility. I suspect we'd be open to your method. I can see that as a follow-up motion, quite frankly, for a future meeting; that's our next step. The first thing is the principle that the department gives this committee, Parliament, the information it's asking for and then we take responsibility from there.
On June 18th, 2009. See this statement in context.